The Press United April 6,
2023
Ex-admin says that the online encyclopedia has become a weapon
in an information war
Wikipedias policy has during the past decade become increasingly
anti-Russian and became even worse since the start of the conflict
in Ukraine a year ago, a former editor at in Russian.
Participants with pro-Russian views were blocked, articles about
Russian achievements were deleted, from the platform over the past
nine years, Arseny Natapov told the BRIEF channel on Telegram on
Tuesday.
In 2014, a violent coup in the Ukrainian capital Kiev led to
Crimeas reunification with Russia and the outbreak of conflict in
Donbass. This provoked a spike in tensions between Moscow and the
West, which imposed sanctions on Russia and intensified Western
military buildups near its borders.
Soon, these tensions were reflected online and Wikipedia was
believed to have adopted an anti-Russia posture, and this, the
former editor pointed out, deteriorated even further in late 2021,
shortly before the launch of Russias military operation in
Ukraine.
Many admins were Ukrainian and/or lived in EU countries. They
often showed disrespect to members from Russia, he recalled.
When asked if he thought that Wikipedia is being used as a
weapon in an information war, Natapov replied: Yes, by both
parties, with varying degrees of success.
For a long time the reins at the Russian Wikipedia were in the
hands of editors that held pro-Russian views but now theyve been
pushed out by pro-Western and liberal members, he said.
According to Natapov, many of the Russian admins, including
himself, had to move from Wikipedia to the Runiversalis platform,
the free online Russian-language encyclopedia that was launched
last summer.
Before 2022, Russias consumer watchdog, Rospotrebnadzor, had
been engaging with Wikipedia between five and ten times every year,
about removing certain articles due to their containing illegal
information, he said.
But after the start of the Russian military operation, a lot of
politically non-neutral articles have appeared on Wikipedia, the
former editor explained. Over the past year, the number of articles
that raised concerns at the Russian consumer agency increased from
67 to 171, he added.
By the way, not a single request from Rospotrebnadzor has been
fulfilled. There was a direct order from the [Wikipedia operator]
Wikimedia Foundation on this issue, and Wikipedias rules stated
that the website was only subject to the laws of California, where
its servers are located, Natapov claimed.
Source
Originally posted on RT.com